CRC vs ARC programs submission

From AussieInnovation Wiki

AIC > Wiki > CRC vs ARC programs submission
Jump to: navigation, search
CRC vs ARC Programs
Created April 2008
Submitted April 2008
Review Reference 56-Robert_Watts
Location Official Review submissions page
Discussion
Authors Robert Watts
Topics CRC, Unrealistic expectations, ARC, Academic excellence

Abstract

“In summary, I am of the opinion that the CRC program has many defects and has probably served its purpose. The ARC programs, with their strong emphasis on academic excellence and the generation of revolutionary rather than evolutionary technologies, should be encouraged.”

NB: Watts points to the A.J. Parker Centre as an exception to his comments and suggests that there is inquiry as to what makes it an effective CRC.

Link: http://www.innovation.gov.au/innovationreview/Documents/56-Robert_Watts.pdf

Notes

None at this stage.

Discussion

This submission is a stub. You can help the Australian Innovation Community by expanding it. For an explanation of the format, please see our submission summary guidelines.</td ></tr >
Retrieved from "http://aussieinnovation.com/wiki/CRC_vs_ARC_programs_submission"
Personal tools